Instructions, beliefs, and adjustment in human learning

Main Article Content

Emilio Ribes
Antonia Padilla
Carlos Martínez

Abstract

This experiment evaluated the effects of two types of adjustments, predictive and effective, and two types of instructions, true or false, on the performance of high school students. Predictive adjustment was studied in probabilistic choice tasks involving four different probability distributions: 0.5-0.5 (random), 0.8-0.2 (random), 0.5-0.5 (periodic), and 0.8-0.2 (periodic). Effective adjustment was studied in simulation tasks involving altered electromagnetic or physical-mechanical properties. In either case, subjects were presented with instructions that proposed four distinctive criteria of adjustment: by «dogma», by «reference», by «training», and by «faith». The type of criterion proposed by the instructions affected the subjects' level of adjustment in predictive as well as effective situations. In the latter case, the two types of instructions that implied factors dependent on the subject's own behavior «training» and «faith» instructions) corresponded with the highest percentaje of adjustment to the experimental situation. By contrast, in predictive tasks a higher level of adjustment was observed with «reference» instructions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ribes, E., Padilla, A., & Martínez, C. (2010). Instructions, beliefs, and adjustment in human learning. Acta Comportamentalia, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.32870/ac.v6i2.18258
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>