Comentario al artículo "Inducción de la Conducta Adjuntiva de fumar... "de J. M. Errasti Pérez y M. Pérez Alvarez
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32870/ac.v2i1.18221Abstract
In the article discussed establishing a distinction between operant and adjunctive behavior. This comment is justified in the light of this dichotomy and that it clearly requires to specify the origin of the behavior that grows into additional charges. It is not the same sort as a phenomenon or as adjunctive adjunctive behavior, which specify that adjunctive behavior is not operating, or can not be understood with the known principles governing the operant behavior. The point of discussion is the counterpoint adjunctive / v / operant versus adjunctive consideration of the phenomenon as a feature of the interaction between operant behaviors. That is, the counterpoint on the adjunctive behavior is not explained by, or escapes, operating principles against the consideration that adjunctive behavior can be explained based on multiple operating contingencies.
Downloads
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/"><img alt="Licencia de Creative Commons" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />Este obra está bajo una <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional</a>.